NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. vs SMT. SONAL VIJAY SHAH @ SANGOI AND ORS. — CAF/2775/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Disposed: --Dismissed on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010131592019
Filing Number
CAF/7885/2019
Filing Date
12-Mar-2019
Registration No
CAF/2775/2019
Registration Date
08-Aug-2019
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
MACP - Single Bench ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Dismissed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Adv. AMOL A GATNE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. SONAL VIJAY SHAH @ SANGOI AND ORS.
-
2.MASTER SHUBHAM VIJAY SHAH@ SANGOI -MINOR THROUGH HIS NATURAL GURDIAN MOTHER
-
3.MR. LAXMICHAND DEVSHI SHAH @ SANGOI
-
4.MRS. JIVARBEN LAXMICHAND SHAH @ SANGOI
-
5.MR. NITIN RAMESHCHANDRA SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
Summary of CAF/2775/2019 The Bombay High Court dismissed National Insurance Co. Ltd.'s application to admit additional evidence (investigator's report on driver's invalid license) and its appeal against the Tribunal's October 2015 liability order. The court found the insurance company failed to provide this evidence during the original proceedings despite having ample opportunity, and rejected the belated attempt to introduce it post-judgment. The claimants are entitled to the awarded compensation with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Sep-2020
For Orders
Registrar(judicial II Fa)
-
04-Sep-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/2775/2019
Summary of CAF/2775/2019 The Bombay High Court dismissed National Insurance Co. Ltd.'s application to admit additional evidence (investigator's report on driver's invalid license) and its appeal against the Tribunal's October 2015 liability order. The court found the insurance company failed to provide this evidence during the original proceedings despite having ample opportunity, and rejected the belated attempt to introduce it post-judgment. The claimants are entitled to the awarded compensation with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts