SAMEER SHRIKANT RANJIT AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ANR — HCBM10131452026
Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010131452026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7609/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
RELIGIOUS/CHARITABLE ENDOWMWNTS AND PUBLIC TRUST ( 33 )
Sub-Category
GRANT/NON GRANT FOR SANCTION/AUTHORISATION FOR ALLIENATION OF IMOVABLE TRUST PROPERTY ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAMEER SHRIKANT RANJIT AND ANR
Adv. joylegal
GAUTAM ASHOK WELKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND ANR
THE JOINT CHARITY COMMISSIONER-II MAHARASHTRA STATE MUMBAI
YATIN DHARGALKAR
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 16-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7609 of 2026 before Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 17th April 2026. Instead of refusing registration outright, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects. If objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7609 of 2026 before Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 17th April 2026. Instead of refusing registration outright, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects. If objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts