SD SVP NAGAR REDEVELOPMENT PVT LTD Wadia Ghandy and Co. vs ANVESH KUMAR — IA/3362/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010131432026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

IA/7607/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

IA/3362/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SD SVP NAGAR REDEVELOPMENT PVT LTD Wadia Ghandy and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANVESH KUMAR

  2. 2.NUPUR GAUTAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed SD SVP Nagar Redevelopment Pvt. Ltd.'s application to condone a 26-day delay in filing a Second Appeal against a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order dated August 21, 2025. The court found the applicant's explanations—including delay in obtaining the reasoned order and organizational restructuring—sustainable and not indicative of negligence or malafide, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities. The delay was condoned subject to payment of Rs. 15,000 costs to respondents within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3362/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed SD SVP Nagar Redevelopment Pvt. Ltd.'s application to condone a 26-day delay in filing a Second Appeal against a Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order dated August 21, 2025. The court found the applicant's explanations—including delay in obtaining the reasoned order and organizational restructuring—sustainable and not indicative of negligence or malafide, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural technicalities. The delay was condoned subject to payment of Rs. 15,000 costs to respondents within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case