RAHULKUMAR BABURAM GAUTAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/1367/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 21,22(2). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010131372026
Filing Number
WP/5534/2026
Filing Date
16-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/1367/2026
Registration Date
17-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Seeking Directions ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 22-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAHULKUMAR BABURAM GAUTAM
Adv. Aher Kunal
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Rahulkumar Baburam Gautam, who sought a declaration that his detention from August 9-11, 2021 was illegal in a murder case. The court found no merit in the petition, noting that the petitioner had suppressed material facts and that under Section 172(3) of the CrPC, an accused is not entitled to access investigation diaries merely because they are referred to by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1367/2026
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Rahulkumar Baburam Gautam, who sought a declaration that his detention from August 9-11, 2021 was illegal in a murder case. The court found no merit in the petition, noting that the petitioner had suppressed material facts and that under Section 172(3) of the CrPC, an accused is not entitled to access investigation diaries merely because they are referred to by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts