YOGESH ENTERPRISES THRO. ITS PROPRIETOR VINAYAK PANDHARINATH BHONGALE vs RESERVE AND OF INDIA THRO. ITS GOVERNOR — WP/7265/2026

Case under Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Section NA. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010131162026

Filing Number

WP/7592/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/7265/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH ENTERPRISES THRO. ITS PROPRIETOR VINAYAK PANDHARINATH BHONGALE

    Adv. Sagar Kursija

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RESERVE AND OF INDIA THRO. ITS GOVERNOR

  2. 2.THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

  3. 3.ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPANY LTD THRO ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR

  4. 4.M/S ATHARVA BUILDWEL THRO ITS PARTNER ANILKUMAR HARIBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: WP 7592/2026 - Yogesh Enterprises v. RBI & Others The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner and advocate a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove outstanding office objections to the writ petition. The petition was previously notified on 22 April 2026 for objection removal but failed to comply. The court warned that failure to cure defects within this extension will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/7265/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 7592/2026 - Yogesh Enterprises v. RBI & Others The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner and advocate a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove outstanding office objections to the writ petition. The petition was previously notified on 22 April 2026 for objection removal but failed to comply. The court warned that failure to cure defects within this extension will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case