SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA USHAJEE PERI vs MAHARASHTRA AGRITECH LTD. — IA/406/2020
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010130602020
Filing Number
IA/406/2020
Filing Date
27-Jan-2020
Registration No
IA/406/2020
Registration Date
27-Jan-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA USHAJEE PERI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHARASHTRA AGRITECH LTD.
-
2.DR. MADHUKAR ATMARAM PATIL -DIRECTOR OF R.NO
-
3.SMT. SHOBHANA M PATIL,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed SEBI's interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an acquittal order. The court held that SEBI officers qualify as public servants under Section 22 of the SEBI Act, making the 6-month limitation period under Section 378(5) CrPC applicable rather than the standard period, and found the appeal was filed within this extended timeline, thus no delay condonation was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
07-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
19-Jul-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. IA/406/2020
The Bombay High Court allowed SEBI's interim application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an acquittal order. The court held that SEBI officers qualify as public servants under Section 22 of the SEBI Act, making the 6-month limitation period under Section 378(5) CrPC applicable rather than the standard period, and found the appeal was filed within this extended timeline, thus no delay condonation was necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts