CHOLAMANDLAM INVESTMENT FINANCE COMPANY LTD THROU. DNYANESH ANIL JOSHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AMD PRS — WP/4614/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010130582026
Filing Number
WP/7553/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
WP/4614/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHOLAMANDLAM INVESTMENT FINANCE COMPANY LTD THROU. DNYANESH ANIL JOSHI
Adv. Medha Rane
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AMD PRS
SNEHA VINOD KAMBLE
THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAUPADA POLICE STATION
MANGESH NARESH PATIL
PRIYANKA MANGESH PATIL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court directed the Court Commissioner to remove the borrowers' movables from the secured property by 20.04.2026, with police assistance, and deposit them at Naupada Police Station. The court held that the borrowers cannot obstruct the handover of vacant possession to the auction purchaser by refusing to remove their belongings, though it reserved observations on the merits of the pending Debts Recovery Tribunal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court directed the Court Commissioner to remove the borrowers' movables from the secured property by 20.04.2026, with police assistance, and deposit them at Naupada Police Station. The court held that the borrowers cannot obstruct the handover of vacant possession to the auction purchaser by refusing to remove their belongings, though it reserved observations on the merits of the pending Debts Recovery Tribunal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts