RACHANA RAGHUVANSHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/1360/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010130412026

Filing Number

WP/5499/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/1360/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Habeas Corpus ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RACHANA RAGHUVANSHI

    Adv. Adv Kalpana V Chate

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  3. 3.SR.POLICE INSPECTOR

  4. 4.SR. POLICE INSPECTOR

  5. 5.PRANVESH SINGH

    Adv. LEGAL VISION

  6. 6.HARIKESH SINGH

  7. 7.BINDU SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition No. 1360 of 2026 – High Court of Bombay The Bombay High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition filed by Mrs. Rachana Raghuvanshi regarding custody of her 3.5-year-old child (Kiyansh) based on a consent order signed by both parties. Under the agreed terms, the child shall remain with the mother, while the father (Respondent No. 5) has exclusive access on alternate days (8:00 AM-7:00 PM), with Saturdays reserved for the mother and Sundays for the father. The court directed both parties to attend mediation on 30/04/2026 for eight weeks to resolve the dispute, including custody and matrimonial issues. If mediation fails, either party may approach the Family Court for final orders, which will decide the matter independently without being influenced by this interim arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition No. 1360 of 2026 – High Court of Bombay The Bombay High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition filed by Mrs. Rachana Raghuvanshi regarding custody of her 3.5-year-old child (Kiyansh) based on a consent order signed by both parties. Under the agreed terms, the child shall remain with the mother, while the father (Respondent No. 5) has exclusive access on alternate days (8:00 AM-7:00 PM), with Saturdays reserved for the mother and Sundays for the father. The court directed both parties to attend mediation on 30/04/2026 for eight weeks to resolve the dispute, including custody and matrimonial issues. If mediation fails, either party may approach the Family Court for final orders, which will decide the matter independently without being influenced by this interim arrangement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case