SHAIKH IBRAHIM ISMAIL SHRI U.B. NIGHOT vs KAMALABAI DHAKU UTTEKAR (DESD) LRS. — WP/3871/2004

Case under Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--ABATED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-May-2004

CNR: HCBM010129002004

Filing Number

WP/14483/2004

Filing Date

22-Apr-2004

Registration No

WP/3871/2004

Registration Date

30-Apr-2004

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ABATED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Rent Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAIKH IBRAHIM ISMAIL SHRI U.B. NIGHOT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMALABAI DHAKU UTTEKAR (DESD) LRS.

    Adv. R.NO. 1 TO 6,R.NO. 1 TO 6,Sudhir Hardikar 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    The Bombay High Court recalled its previous order dated 30.04.2026 that had abated the writ petition due to the death of respondents. The court found that legal heirs of Respondent No. 1 (deceased in 2021) were already on record, and while Respondent No. 3 died in February 2026, the petition could proceed. The case was adjourned to 15.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Rent Act -- Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  6. 16-Jan-2012

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka

  7. 27-Aug-2004

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.G. KarnikView PDF

  8. 27-Aug-2004

    Due Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice D.G. Karnik

  9. 05-May-2004

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 22-Apr-2004

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3871/2004

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court recalled its previous order dated 30.04.2026 that had abated the writ petition due to the death of respondents. The court found that legal heirs of Respondent No. 1 (deceased in 2021) were already on record, and while Respondent No. 3 died in February 2026, the petition could proceed. The case was adjourned to 15.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case