GOPAL MUTHA vs THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10128972026

Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010128972026

Filing Number

WP/7444/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL MUTHA

    Adv. Economic Laws Practice

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS

  2. 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (DIV-II)CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE

  3. 3.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND C EX THANE RURAL

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 05-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7444 of 2026, petitioner Gopal Mutha's petition against the Union of India and CGST authorities was adjourned. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections previously notified on April 17, 2026, after the petitioner and advocate initially failed to do so. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7444 of 2026, petitioner Gopal Mutha's petition against the Union of India and CGST authorities was adjourned. The Registrar granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections previously notified on April 17, 2026, after the petitioner and advocate initially failed to do so. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case