MANOJ MADHUKAR WAGHMARE AND ANR vs THE COMMISSIONER MALEGAON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS — HCBM10128322026
Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010128322026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7410/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ MADHUKAR WAGHMARE AND ANR
Adv. NIKHIL G HIRE
Respondent(s)
THE COMMISSIONER MALEGAON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS
THE COMMISSIONER MALEGAON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
THE EDUCATION OFFICER, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY)
UMA SUNNY MODI
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 17-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Summary In Writ Petition No. 7410 of 2026, the Bombay High Court found that petitioners Manoj Madhukar Waghmare and another failed to remove office objections despite notification on 17th April 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove the objections. If objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Writ Petition No. 7410 of 2026, the Bombay High Court found that petitioners Manoj Madhukar Waghmare and another failed to remove office objections despite notification on 17th April 2026. Rather than refuse registration outright, the Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to remove the objections. If objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts