SACHIN CHANDRAKANT CHOUGULE AND ANR vs MINTIFI FINSERVE PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS — WP/1341/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,14,21. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010128222026
Filing Number
WP/5423/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/1341/2026
Registration Date
16-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Seeking Directions ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SACHIN CHANDRAKANT CHOUGULE AND ANR
Adv. SANDEEP KUMAR SINGH
-
2.SHREEPAD ULHAS NAIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.MINTIFI FINSERVE PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS
-
2.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
4.THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted instructions that the petitioner would pursue appropriate legal remedies before the competent court having jurisdiction over the relevant police station where criminal proceedings are ongoing. The court kept all contentions open, clarifying that withdrawal of this petition would not prevent the petitioner from raising those contentions subsequently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1341/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted instructions that the petitioner would pursue appropriate legal remedies before the competent court having jurisdiction over the relevant police station where criminal proceedings are ongoing. The court kept all contentions open, clarifying that withdrawal of this petition would not prevent the petitioner from raising those contentions subsequently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts