GOLDEN CHAMBERS PREMISES CSL THR SECURITY INCHARGRE OFFICER PRASHANT VINAYAK PATOLE vs STATE OF THE MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM10128042026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010128042026
Filing Number
AO/7392/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench Matters ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOLDEN CHAMBERS PREMISES CSL THR SECURITY INCHARGRE OFFICER PRASHANT VINAYAK PATOLE
Adv. SATPATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF THE MAHARASHTRA THR. THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. ,GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS 1123
-
2.DINESH RAMKARAN YADAV
Adv. C K Tripathi
-
3.RAMESH AADITYA RAMKARAN YADAV
Adv. C K Tripathi
-
4.HARISH CHANDRA WATKAR THE SR INSPECTOR OF POLICE ATTACHED
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal filed by Golden Chambers Premises Security Officer Prashant Vinayak Patole against the State of Maharashtra and others, finding that arguable questions were raised. The court clarified that the admission of the appeal will not obstruct the ongoing trial at the evidence stage, and directed the Trial Court to continue proceedings in accordance with the court's prior order dated August 12, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Notification (Objection Not Removed)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
30-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted the appeal filed by Golden Chambers Premises Security Officer Prashant Vinayak Patole against the State of Maharashtra and others, finding that arguable questions were raised. The court clarified that the admission of the appeal will not obstruct the ongoing trial at the evidence stage, and directed the Trial Court to continue proceedings in accordance with the court's prior order dated August 12, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts