KASI SALES AND SERVICES PVT LTD, THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR SUNIL TANEJA vs M/S SKF INDIA LTD THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR MUKUND VASUDEVAN — HCBM10127022026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010127022026
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
ARP/7330/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KASI SALES AND SERVICES PVT LTD, THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR SUNIL TANEJA
Adv. Shyam K Singh
Respondent(s)
M/S SKF INDIA LTD THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR MUKUND VASUDEVAN
SKF ENGINEERING AND LUBRICATION INDIA PVT LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S LINCOLN HELIOS INDIA LTD
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN
FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED
FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED
FOR HEARING (ARBITRATION PETITION U/S. 11)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED |
| 21-04-2026 | FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED |
| 09-07-2026 | FOR HEARING (ARBITRATION PETITION U/S. 11) |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the arbitration petition filed by Kasi Sales and Services Pvt. Ltd. against SKF India Ltd. and SKF Engineering and Lubrication India Pvt. Ltd. The court directed respondents to provide reorganization details within one week, after which the petitioner must amend the petition within two weeks. The case was relisted for July 9, 2026, with a structured timeline for filing amended pleadings, replies, and rejoinders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the arbitration petition filed by Kasi Sales and Services Pvt. Ltd. against SKF India Ltd. and SKF Engineering and Lubrication India Pvt. Ltd. The court directed respondents to provide reorganization details within one week, after which the petitioner must amend the petition within two weeks. The case was relisted for July 9, 2026, with a structured timeline for filing amended pleadings, replies, and rejoinders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts