BHUVNESH KUMAR SHARMA vs RESERVE BANK OF INDIA THR ITS COMPETENT AUTHOIRTY AND ORS Advocate - LITTLE AND COMPANY, ,LITTLE AND COMPANY,LITTLE AND COMPANY,LITTLE AND COMPANY,LITTLE AND COMPANY — WP/3689/2026
Case under The Sexual Harassment of Woman at Workpalce(prevention,prohibition and Redressal) Act Section NA. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010126262026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/7287/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
WP/3689/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHUVNESH KUMAR SHARMA
Adv. VIKRAMJEET M SIRAM
Respondent(s)
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA THR ITS COMPETENT AUTHOIRTY AND ORS Advocate - LITTLE AND COMPANY, ,LITTLE AND COMPANY,LITTLE AND COMPANY,LITTLE AND COMPANY,LITTLE AND COMPANY
INTERNAL COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE
Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY (CA)
Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY
THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY
Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY
SURABHI AGNIHOTRI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 15-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 04-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 06-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/3689/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 15th June 2026. The court granted the petitioner's request to amend the petition to mask the identity of Respondent No. 5 and confirmed proper service by speed post. Respondent No. 1's counsel undertook to inform Respondent No. 5 of the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/3689/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 15th June 2026. The court granted the petitioner's request to amend the petition to mask the identity of Respondent No. 5 and confirmed proper service by speed post. Respondent No. 1's counsel undertook to inform Respondent No. 5 of the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts