NITIN DNYANOBA BEDGE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/681/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010125592026

Filing Number

ABA/5312/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

ABA/681/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 143, 223, 3(5)
Prevention of Illicit Traffic Act (P.i.t.a) Section 3, 4, 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN DNYANOBA BEDGE

    Adv. HARSHWARDHAN M PAWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Nitin Dnyanoba Bedge in a case involving alleged immoral trafficking charges. The court found insufficient evidence to establish ownership of the spa premises (applicant merely signed as witness, not owner) or his knowledge of illegal activities, noting that victim statements before the magistrate contained no imputations against him and no substantive material (CCTV footage, rope evidence) was seized or documented. Bail was granted on a ₹25,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions against tampering with evidence or contacting victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ABA/681/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Nitin Dnyanoba Bedge in a case involving alleged immoral trafficking charges. The court found insufficient evidence to establish ownership of the spa premises (applicant merely signed as witness, not owner) or his knowledge of illegal activities, noting that victim statements before the magistrate contained no imputations against him and no substantive material (CCTV footage, rope evidence) was seized or documented. Bail was granted on a ₹25,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions against tampering with evidence or contacting victims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case