MR. MAGAN BHAU MATLE THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE vs MRS. AASHA DHANANJAY MATALE THR POA MR.DHANANJAY BALWANT MATALE — IA/2263/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010125002026
Filing Number
IA/7207/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
IA/2263/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench Matters ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 22-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MR. MAGAN BHAU MATLE THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
Adv. Yogesh Thorat
-
2.MRS. TAIBAI JANARDHAN GUNJAL THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
3.MRS. SUMAN NAKAJI SHINDE THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
4.MR. BALSHRIRAM NARAYAN GUNJAL THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
5.MR. SUBHASH NARAYAN GUNJAL THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
6.MR. HARIBHAU NARAYAN GUNJAL THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
7.MRS. SUMITRA BHASKAR DUMBARE THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
8.MRS. KAUSHABAI VIMAL BALSHRIRA THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE M KUNJIR
-
9.VILAS NARAYAN GUNJAL THR ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
-
10.SHRI JALINDAR MAGAN MATALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.MRS. AASHA DHANANJAY MATALE THR POA MR.DHANANJAY BALWANT MATALE
-
2.MRS. SWATI SANTOSH MATALE THR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR SANTOSH DEVRAM MATALE
-
3.MRS. SHITAL NAVNATH MATALE THR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR SANTOSH DEVRAM MATALE
-
4.MRS. SAKUBAI SHANTARAM GUNJAL
-
5.MRS. CHANDRABHAGA ARJUN GUNJAL THR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR SANTOSH DEVRAM MATALE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the interim application as infructuous since the standing crop subject to the dispute had already been harvested and removed by the applicant, rendering the cause of action moot. The court granted liberty to the parties to file fresh applications if similar grievances arise in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/2263/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of the interim application as infructuous since the standing crop subject to the dispute had already been harvested and removed by the applicant, rendering the cause of action moot. The court granted liberty to the parties to file fresh applications if similar grievances arise in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts