TRO REALMARKS THR ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI PRASAD NIVRUTTI ULPE vs UMESH SHALIKRAM HADKE — ARP/91/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010124152026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

ARP/7156/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

ARP/91/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

TRO REALMARKS THR ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI PRASAD NIVRUTTI ULPE

Adv. Ronak Utagikar

Respondent(s)

UMESH SHALIKRAM HADKE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

25-03-2026

FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED

21-04-2026

FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN
23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

The Bombay High Court granted TRO Realmarks' petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Mr. Abhishek M. Karnik as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from the May 2025 agreement between the parties. The court directed the arbitrator to issue a disclosure statement within two weeks, fixed arbitrator fees to be shared equally by both parties, and allowed the respondent to file a counter-claim before the tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted TRO Realmarks' petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing Mr. Abhishek M. Karnik as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from the May 2025 agreement between the parties. The court directed the arbitrator to issue a disclosure statement within two weeks, fixed arbitrator fees to be shared equally by both parties, and allowed the respondent to file a counter-claim before the tribunal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case