ARJUN RAMESHWA NIRMAL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1165/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Status: For Admission (Bail Applications). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010123792026
Filing Number
BA/5239/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
BA/1165/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARJUN RAMESHWA NIRMAL
Adv. Abhilasha Pawar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Case BA/1165/2026 Summary: In this criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, Arjun Rameshwa Nirmal sought bail against the State of Maharashtra. On 6th May 2026, after hearing counsel for both parties, Justice Shivkumar Dige adjourned the case to 11th June 2026 at the request of the respective counsel. No interim order on bail was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
05-May-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/1165/2026
Case BA/1165/2026 Summary: In this criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court, Arjun Rameshwa Nirmal sought bail against the State of Maharashtra. On 6th May 2026, after hearing counsel for both parties, Justice Shivkumar Dige adjourned the case to 11th June 2026 at the request of the respective counsel. No interim order on bail was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts