Shruthi Jaideep Nair vs Jaideep Sivadas Nair — HCBM10122552026

Case under Family Court Act Section 226. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010122552026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/7067/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 226
Hindu Marriage Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shruthi Jaideep Nair

    Adv. B B DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jaideep Sivadas Nair

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7067 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) ordered that petitioner Shruthi Jaideep Nair and her advocate be granted two weeks to remove office objections to the petition. The petition had been notified on April 27, 2026 for removal of objections, but the petitioner failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules 1960, the court granted an additional opportunity. If objections remain uncured within two weeks, appropriate orders rejecting the petition will follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 7067 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) ordered that petitioner Shruthi Jaideep Nair and her advocate be granted two weeks to remove office objections to the petition. The petition had been notified on April 27, 2026 for removal of objections, but the petitioner failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules 1960, the court granted an additional opportunity. If objections remain uncured within two weeks, appropriate orders rejecting the petition will follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case