B T KADLAG CONSTRUCTIONS vs THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND ORS — WP/5972/2026
Case under Employment Provident Fund & Misc. P. Act Section na. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010121342026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/6994/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5972/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B T KADLAG CONSTRUCTIONS
Adv. Anushree Koparkar
Respondent(s)
THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND ORS
NIPHAD SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.
THE CHAIRMAN, NASHIK DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 08-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 09-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5972/2026 B T Kadlag Constructions v. The Employees Provident Fund Organization and Ors The writ petition was admitted and notices were issued to respondents returnable on 9th June 2026. Service of notice was waived for Respondent No.4, while the petitioner was permitted to effect private service on Respondents 1-3. The court issued an interim order directing that the attached bank account attachment shall continue, but Respondent No.1 is restrained from withdrawing amounts already attached pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5972/2026 B T Kadlag Constructions v. The Employees Provident Fund Organization and Ors The writ petition was admitted and notices were issued to respondents returnable on 9th June 2026. Service of notice was waived for Respondent No.4, while the petitioner was permitted to effect private service on Respondents 1-3. The court issued an interim order directing that the attached bank account attachment shall continue, but Respondent No.1 is restrained from withdrawing amounts already attached pending the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts