VIJAY DOULAT THAKUR PROPRIETOR SAKALP RESTAURANT KAY ENTERPRISES vs THE DIRECTOR GENERAL THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS — HCBM10121112026
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010121112026
Filing Number
WP/6978/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY DOULAT THAKUR PROPRIETOR SAKALP RESTAURANT KAY ENTERPRISES
Adv. M D bansode
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS
-
2.THE RECOVERY OFFICER, THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, DEPUTY REGIONAL OFFICE THANE
-
3.THE BRANCH MANAGER, AXIS BANK LTD
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary Writ Petition No. 6978 of 2026 | Bombay High Court The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner Vijay Doulat Thakur a final two-week opportunity (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to the writ petition against the Employees State Insurance Corporation and others. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to cure defects despite earlier directions. If office objections are not removed within the prescribed timeframe, the writ petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
23-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary Writ Petition No. 6978 of 2026 | Bombay High Court The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner Vijay Doulat Thakur a final two-week opportunity (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to the writ petition against the Employees State Insurance Corporation and others. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to cure defects despite earlier directions. If office objections are not removed within the prescribed timeframe, the writ petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts