VIJAY DOULAT THAKUR PROPRIETOR SAKALP RESTAURANT KAY ENTERPRISES vs THE DIRECTOR GENERAL THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS — HCBM10121112026
Case under Employees' State Insurance Act Section ---. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010121112026
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/6978/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAY DOULAT THAKUR PROPRIETOR SAKALP RESTAURANT KAY ENTERPRISES
Adv. M D bansode
Respondent(s)
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS
THE RECOVERY OFFICER, THE EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, DEPUTY REGIONAL OFFICE THANE
THE BRANCH MANAGER, AXIS BANK LTD
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Case Summary Writ Petition No. 6978 of 2026 | Bombay High Court The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner Vijay Doulat Thakur a final two-week opportunity (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to the writ petition against the Employees State Insurance Corporation and others. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to cure defects despite earlier directions. If office objections are not removed within the prescribed timeframe, the writ petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Writ Petition No. 6978 of 2026 | Bombay High Court The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioner Vijay Doulat Thakur a final two-week opportunity (excluding summer vacation) to remove office objections to the writ petition against the Employees State Insurance Corporation and others. The petitioner's advocate had previously failed to cure defects despite earlier directions. If office objections are not removed within the prescribed timeframe, the writ petition's registration will be automatically refused without further court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts