MOHINI HARESH DHARMA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS Advocate - Pooja Joshi — WP/3539/2026

Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010120862026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/6965/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

WP/3539/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY LABOUR MATTERS ( 46 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

MOHINI HARESH DHARMA

Adv. Yash K Jagdale

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS Advocate - Pooja Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

23-03-2026

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

20-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

30-03-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA,HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA

The Bombay High Court disposed of Dr. Mohini Haresh Dharma's writ petition by directing the respondent Corporation to decide her representation by May 6, 2026. On the compliance hearing, the Corporation submitted its decision order dated May 6, 2026, which the court accepted as compliance with the earlier directive. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the Corporation's decision in separate proceedings on merits and in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Dr. Mohini Haresh Dharma's writ petition by directing the respondent Corporation to decide her representation by May 6, 2026. On the compliance hearing, the Corporation submitted its decision order dated May 6, 2026, which the court accepted as compliance with the earlier directive. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the Corporation's decision in separate proceedings on merits and in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case