AMIT MHASKU AVCHARE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1138/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010120762026
Filing Number
BA/5121/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
BA/1138/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMIT MHASKU AVCHARE
Adv. Ishan Paradkar
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR PASSING ORDER
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR PASSING ORDER |
| 17-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: BA/1138/2026 The High Court of Bombay granted bail to Amit Mhasku Avchare in a criminal case involving charges of conspiracy and illegal weapons possession under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, Arms Act, and Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The court found that no actual firing or injury occurred and that allegations of planning to kill the informant require trial to prove; since the co-accused with identical allegations was already released on bail, the applicant was similarly granted bail on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance with conditions including police attendance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA/1138/2026 The High Court of Bombay granted bail to Amit Mhasku Avchare in a criminal case involving charges of conspiracy and illegal weapons possession under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, Arms Act, and Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. The court found that no actual firing or injury occurred and that allegations of planning to kill the informant require trial to prove; since the co-accused with identical allegations was already released on bail, the applicant was similarly granted bail on Rs. 25,000 personal recognizance with conditions including police attendance and no witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts