ASHOK CHIMAJI NAVSUPE vs ALICON CASTALLOY LTD. — WP/2174/2025
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010120402023
Filing Number
WP/7109/2023
Filing Date
13-03-2023
Registration No
WP/2174/2025
Registration Date
13-02-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOK CHIMAJI NAVSUPE
Adv. Gaurav Gawande
Respondent(s)
ALICON CASTALLOY LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2024 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 08-01-2024 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 28-11-2023 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 17-10-2023 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 26-04-2024 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/2174/2025 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petitions filed by employees Ashok Chimaji Navsupe and Shahaji Madhukar Jadhav against Alicon Castalloy Limited. The court quashed the Labour Court's termination award and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, finding the guilt finding lacked sufficient evidentiary foundation—particularly the allegation of submitting a forged B.A. certificate without proper proof or examination of the handwriting expert's report. Both parties are now permitted to present evidence before the Labour Court within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/2174/2025 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court partly allowed the writ petitions filed by employees Ashok Chimaji Navsupe and Shahaji Madhukar Jadhav against Alicon Castalloy Limited. The court quashed the Labour Court's termination award and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, finding the guilt finding lacked sufficient evidentiary foundation—particularly the allegation of submitting a forged B.A. certificate without proper proof or examination of the handwriting expert's report. Both parties are now permitted to present evidence before the Labour Court within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts