SHAHARUK MINOO ENGINEER AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY OF REVENUE DEPT. AND ORS — HCBM10120042026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: 08th May 2026.

For Orders (Regular) Next hearing 08-May-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010120042026

Filing Number

WP/6900/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAHARUK MINOO ENGINEER AND ANR

    Adv. Ajay A Joshi

  2. 2.XERXES MINOO ENGINEER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY OF REVENUE DEPT. AND ORS

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.ASSISTANT COLLECTOR

  4. 4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER

  5. 5.SHIRIN DADY BHEDWAR

  6. 6.KHURSHID DADY BHEDWAR

  7. 7.SOURABH DADY BHEDWAR

  8. 8.SHRI A. P. PADUMJEE

Case History

  1. 08-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 6900 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections despite being granted two weeks by the Registrar. The court granted one final opportunity: the petitioners must remove office objections within two weeks (excluding summer vacation), or the petition's registration will be automatically refused without further notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 6900 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners failed to remove office objections despite being granted two weeks by the Registrar. The court granted one final opportunity: the petitioners must remove office objections within two weeks (excluding summer vacation), or the petition's registration will be automatically refused without further notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case