SUNIL MAHENDRA SURATWALA AND ORS vs RAJARAM GANPAT MUJUMLE AND ORS — WP/5408/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010118292026

Filing Number

WP/6797/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/5408/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL MAHENDRA SURATWALA AND ORS

    Adv. POOJA KANKARIYA

  2. 2.RAJESH RAMCHANDRA MEHTA

  3. 3.SONIA RAJESH MEHTA

  4. 4.PRAMOD VASUDEV GOKHALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJARAM GANPAT MUJUMLE AND ORS

  2. 2.LATE. SURESH GANPAT MUJUMLE SINCE DECEASED, THR. LRS.(Legal Heir)2.

  3. 3.MUKUND SURESH MUJUMLE2.

  4. 4.SITARAM SURESH MUJUMLE

  5. 5.DILIP GANPAT MUJUMLE

  6. 6.NARAYAN GANPAT MUJUMLE

  7. 7.BABAN GENBA MUJUMLE

  8. 8.ROHIDAS GENBA MUJUMLE

  9. 9.SHIVAJI GENBA MUJUMLE

  10. 10.KUNDLIK TUKARAM MUJUMLE

  11. 11.RAMDAS TUKARAM MUJUMLE

  12. 12.LATE BAJIRAO PANDURANG MUJUMLE (SINCE DECEASED THR. LRS)(Legal Heir)10.

  13. 13.RAMKRISHNA BAJIRAO MUJUMLE10.

  14. 14.DEEPAK BAJIRAO MUJUMLE

  15. 15.SARJERAO PANDHURANG MUJUMLE

  16. 16.LATE ATMARAM PANDURANG MUJUMLE SINCE DECEASED THR. LR.(Legal Heir)12.

  17. 17.PANDURANG ATMARAM MUJUMLE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Civil Judge's order that affirmed civil court jurisdiction over a suit seeking cancellation of mutation entries and declaration that revenue authority orders are null and void. The court held that even where exclusive jurisdiction is conferred on revenue authorities, civil courts retain jurisdiction if procedural nullity or violations of natural justice occurred, and because the suit sought composite relief including declarations, the trial court's jurisdiction was valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5408/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Civil Judge's order that affirmed civil court jurisdiction over a suit seeking cancellation of mutation entries and declaration that revenue authority orders are null and void. The court held that even where exclusive jurisdiction is conferred on revenue authorities, civil courts retain jurisdiction if procedural nullity or violations of natural justice occurred, and because the suit sought composite relief including declarations, the trial court's jurisdiction was valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case