SATYAN SHIVKUMAR PANDEY vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/621/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010117522026
Filing Number
ABA/5008/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
ABA/621/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SATYAN SHIVKUMAR PANDEY
Adv. shivamdeshmukh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
For Circulation -1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
15-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
Case Summary: ABA/621/2026 Outcome: The anticipatory bail application was adjourned to 17th June 2026 due to lack of time. Until the next hearing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. The applicant's counsel argued that Accused No. 4, with a similar role, was discharged under Section 189 BNSS 2023, while the applicant was excluded from that report and not named in the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
04-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
28-Apr-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Admission (Anticipatory Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/621/2026
Case Summary: ABA/621/2026 Outcome: The anticipatory bail application was adjourned to 17th June 2026 due to lack of time. Until the next hearing, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. The applicant's counsel argued that Accused No. 4, with a similar role, was discharged under Section 189 BNSS 2023, while the applicant was excluded from that report and not named in the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts