HASHMANT ALI HAIDAR ALI KHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/817/2026
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010117262026
Filing Number
IA/4997/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
IA/817/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Others ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HASHMANT ALI HAIDAR ALI KHAN
Adv. Vaibhav Vasantrao Ugle
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
-
2.AFSAR ALI KHAN SHAIKH @HANNAN
-
3.MOHAMMAD SUBHAN @MOHD, HASIM SAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to the applicants (drivers of the deceased) in a death case involving charges under Sections 103(1), 238, and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie no evidence of conspiracy between the applicants and co-accused in the alleged murder, determining the offense attributable to them was limited to Section 238 (BNS). Considering their clean criminal records and low flight risk, bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 15,000 P.R. Bond each with surety, subject to standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/817/2026
Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to the applicants (drivers of the deceased) in a death case involving charges under Sections 103(1), 238, and 61(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found prima facie no evidence of conspiracy between the applicants and co-accused in the alleged murder, determining the offense attributable to them was limited to Section 238 (BNS). Considering their clean criminal records and low flight risk, bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 15,000 P.R. Bond each with surety, subject to standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts