NIVRUTTI RAMDAS APSUNDE AND ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR HONBLE REVENU AND FOREST MINISTER AND ORS — HCBM10116442026
Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010116442026
Filing Number
WP/6687/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )
Sub-Category
Single Bench ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIVRUTTI RAMDAS APSUNDE AND ORS
Adv. PRATIK BALASAHEB RAHADE
-
2.SHANTARAM SAVALIRAM APSUNDE
-
3.ANUSAYABAI SAVALIRAM APSUNDE
-
4.SUNITA NIVRUTTI APSUNDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR HONBLE REVENU AND FOREST MINISTER AND ORS
-
2.THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, NASHIK DIVISION, NASHIK
-
3.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR NASHIK
-
4.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, DINDORI SUB-DIVISION, DINDORI
-
5.SITARAM SUKA SHEWALE SINCE DECEASED THRO LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir)5.
-
6.DASHARATH SITARAM SHEWALE5.
-
7.RAMCHANDRA SITARAM SHEWALE SINCE DECEASED THRO LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir)5.2.
-
8.VINAYAK SITARAM SHEWALE5.2.
-
9.SUNIL SIATARAM SHEWALE
-
10.DEUBAI DAULAT SHEWALE
-
11.GULAB DAULAT SHEWALE
-
12.RAMDAS DAULAT SHEWALE
-
13.KALPANA SHAMRAO GANGURDE
-
14.RAMBHABAI SAJAN DHAVALE
-
15.POPAT KACHARU SHEWALE SINCE DECEASED THRO LEGAL HEIR(Legal Heir)11.
-
16.MADHUKAR POPAT SHEWALE11.
-
17.DHANANJAY POPAT SHEWALE11.
-
18.SUNIL POPAT SHEWALE11.
-
19.DURGABAI POPAT SHEWALE11.
-
20.DEVAYANI KANTILAL AHER11.
-
21.CHANDRABHAGABAI POPAT SHEWALE
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to petitioners challenging the Maharashtra government's order to resume their vatan land after 50 years. The court stayed execution of the resumption order dated 14.10.2024 and directed authorities not to evict petitioners from the agricultural land in Nashik district. The court found the petitioners had made an arguable case, noting they had possessed the land, paid taxes and assessments for over 50 years. The case is scheduled for hearing on 9 June 2026, with the government directed to file a response within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to petitioners challenging the Maharashtra government's order to resume their vatan land after 50 years. The court stayed execution of the resumption order dated 14.10.2024 and directed authorities not to evict petitioners from the agricultural land in Nashik district. The court found the petitioners had made an arguable case, noting they had possessed the land, paid taxes and assessments for over 50 years. The case is scheduled for hearing on 9 June 2026, with the government directed to file a response within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts