EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NANDUR MADHYAMESHWAR PROJECT vs LAXMAN BABURAO GOVARDHANE AND ORS. — HCBM10114872026
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010114872026
Filing Number
IA/6584/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Judge
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Coram
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Land Aquisition - Single Bench ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NANDUR MADHYAMESHWAR PROJECT
Adv. CHAITRALI ANAND DESHMUKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.LAXMAN BABURAO GOVARDHANE AND ORS.
-
2.PRABHAKAR RAMKRISHAN GOVARDHANE THR LRS 2.1 ABHIMANYU PRABHKAR GOVARDHANE(Legal Heir)2.
-
3.ABHIMANYU PRABHAKAR GOVARDHANE2.
-
4.RAHUL PRABHAKAR GOVARDHANE2.
-
5.MANDABAI PRABHAKAR GOVARDHANE2.
-
6.PUSHPA DATTATRAY KATORE2.
-
7.SAVITA EKNATH BUTE
-
8.SITABAI RAMKRISHAN GOVARDHANE(DELETED)
-
9.SULOCHANA SUBHASH DEMASE
-
10.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)
-
07-May-2026
Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay directed the applicant's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity, excluding summer vacation. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration of the interim applications and appropriate adverse orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The High Court of Bombay directed the applicant's advocate to remove office objections within two weeks as a final opportunity, excluding summer vacation. Failure to comply will result in refusal of registration of the interim applications and appropriate adverse orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts