DEEPAK NARPATMAL LODHA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE INDUSTRIES, ENERGY AND LABOUR DEPARTMENT AND ORS — WP/943/2021

Case under Mah. Industrial Developement Rules,1962 Section OTHER ACT. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2022.

CNR: HCBM010111782021

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/6249/2021

Filing Date

11-03-2021

Registration No

WP/943/2021

Registration Date

22-03-2021

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.V. GANGAPURWALA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.V. GANGAPURWALA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06th May 2022

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Industrial Developement Rules,1962 Section OTHER ACT

Petitioner(s)

DEEPAK NARPATMAL LODHA

Adv. Atharva A.Dandekar

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE INDUSTRIES, ENERGY AND LABOUR DEPARTMENT AND ORS

THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PANVEL

MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Adv. NAVDEEP VORA and ASSOCIATES

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S.V. GANGAPURWALA , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. G. SEWLIKAR

23-03-2021

FOR CIRCULATION

22-04-2021

FOR ADMISSION

06-04-2021

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

The Bombay High Court heard Writ Petition 943/2021 filed by Ghevarchand R. Sanghavi against the State of Maharashtra on May 6, 2026. Due to time constraints, the court could not complete hearing the petition but marked it as "Part-Heard" after both parties agreed, given the considerable time already spent on arguments. The matter was adjourned to June 11, 2026 for further directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court heard Writ Petition 943/2021 filed by Ghevarchand R. Sanghavi against the State of Maharashtra on May 6, 2026. Due to time constraints, the court could not complete hearing the petition but marked it as "Part-Heard" after both parties agreed, given the considerable time already spent on arguments. The matter was adjourned to June 11, 2026 for further directions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case