THE R.D.C.C. BANK LTD., vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. — WP/1690/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010110472022

Filing Number

WP/4537/2022

Filing Date

15-Mar-2022

Registration No

WP/1690/2022

Registration Date

17-May-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227
Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE R.D.C.C. BANK LTD.,

    Adv. TUUSHAR SONAWANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

  2. 2.DHWAJA KALUSINGH GORKHA

    Adv. NISHANT MOKAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court allowed R.D.C.C. Bank's petition and set aside the lower court's order rejecting the bank's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court found the delay was not deliberate, as the bank had forwarded case papers to its panel lawyer upon receiving the certified judgment copy in January 2020, and the COVID-19 lockdown (March 2020-March 2021) prevented timely filing, citing the Supreme Court's directive excluding this period from limitation. The appellate court was directed to expedite the appeal decision given the case's age since 2001. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  4. 15-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1690/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court allowed R.D.C.C. Bank's petition and set aside the lower court's order rejecting the bank's application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court found the delay was not deliberate, as the bank had forwarded case papers to its panel lawyer upon receiving the certified judgment copy in January 2020, and the COVID-19 lockdown (March 2020-March 2021) prevented timely filing, citing the Supreme Court's directive excluding this period from limitation. The appellate court was directed to expedite the appeal decision given the case's age since 2001. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case