SANJAY SARRAF vs DROPATI GODAMBE AND MR. BHARAT BABURAO GODAMBE — WP/3701/2026
Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Status: For Circulation. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010110372026
Filing Number
WP/6345/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/3701/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANJAY SARRAF
Respondent(s)
-
1.DROPATI GODAMBE AND MR. BHARAT BABURAO GODAMBE
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER FOR CO-OPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF CO-OP. SOC
-
3.THE JOINT REGISTRAR (SRA), CO-OP, SOC
-
4.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, CO-OP SOC
-
5.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND CONTROLLER OF STAMPS
-
6.THE COLLECTOR OF STAMP (ENFORCEMENT-
-
7.SAGAR GOSAVI (PANEL AUDITOR U/S
-
8.VIVEK JADHAV (PANEL AUDITOR U/S
-
9.DAVDASH AROSKAR (PANEL AUDITOR U/S
-
10.THE CHIEF OFFICER, MHADA (MUMBAI BOARD)
-
11.THE ESTATE MANAGER, MHADA (BANDRA DIVISION)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
The Bombay High Court transferred the writ petition to an appropriate bench, holding that the case involved quasi-judicial orders and provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, Housing and Area Development Act, and Slum Areas Act, which fall outside the current bench's jurisdiction. The petition was not decided on merits but redirected for proper assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3701/2026
The Bombay High Court transferred the writ petition to an appropriate bench, holding that the case involved quasi-judicial orders and provisions of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, Housing and Area Development Act, and Slum Areas Act, which fall outside the current bench's jurisdiction. The petition was not decided on merits but redirected for proper assignment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts