Dosti Realty Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Deputy Commissioner Local Body Tax Advocate - Aniesh S Jadhav — HCBM10107252026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section Article14,19,21and227. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010107252026

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

e-Filing Number

27-02-2026

Filing Number

WP/6164/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section Article14,19,21and227

Petitioner(s)

Dosti Realty Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES

Respondent(s)

Deputy Commissioner Local Body Tax Advocate - Aniesh S Jadhav

Municipal Commissioner Local Body Tax

Adv. Aniesh S Jadhav

State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

27-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

24-06-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

Orders

09-06-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Case Summary: Dosti Realty Limited's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 6164 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 27 April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration under procedural rules, the court granted an additional two-week opportunity to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply would result in rejection of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dosti Realty Limited's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 6164 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 27 April 2026. Rather than immediately refusing registration under procedural rules, the court granted an additional two-week opportunity to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply would result in rejection of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case