AMINES AND PLASTICIZERS LTD vs APL INVESTENTS LTD Advocate - J J Thakkar — WP/3128/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010106912026

Filing Number

WP/6142/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/3128/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMINES AND PLASTICIZERS LTD

    Adv. Sujit Lahoti and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.APL INVESTENTS LTD Advocate - J J Thakkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/3128/2026 Amines And Plasticizers Limited v. APL Investments Limited The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petitions challenging orders that rejected applications to recall a witness and produce additional evidence in a 16-year-old property recovery suit. The court held that the petitioner (defendant-licensee), who possessed bills supporting expenditure claims for over 16 years, could not suddenly produce them after evidence closure, finding the application was a deliberate delay tactic contrary to established judicial principles on reopening evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3128/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3128/2026 Amines And Plasticizers Limited v. APL Investments Limited The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petitions challenging orders that rejected applications to recall a witness and produce additional evidence in a 16-year-old property recovery suit. The court held that the petitioner (defendant-licensee), who possessed bills supporting expenditure claims for over 16 years, could not suddenly produce them after evidence closure, finding the application was a deliberate delay tactic contrary to established judicial principles on reopening evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case