SUNIL DADA GAJI R R Chavan vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. — APEAL/187/2024
Case under Mah. Protection of Interests of Depositors Section 11. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010106822024
Filing Number
APEAL/4536/2024
Filing Date
26-02-2024
Registration No
APEAL/187/2024
Registration Date
26-02-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )
Sub-Category
Appeal Misc. Others ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNIL DADA GAJI R R Chavan
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
THE P. I. OF CHATURSHRUNGI POLICE STATION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Admission_
-DUE ADMISSION
-DUE ADMISSION
-DUE ADMISSION
-ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2024 | Admission_ |
| 23-04-2026 | -DUE ADMISSION |
| 02-04-2026 | -DUE ADMISSION |
| 17-03-2026 | -DUE ADMISSION |
| 20-02-2026 | -ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: APPEAL/187/2024 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the rejection of his discharge application under Section 227 of the CrPC, finding sufficient prima facie evidence to proceed with charges. Key Reasoning: The court found that appellant Sunil Dada Gaji played a significant role in the Temple Rose Real Estate fraud scheme by luring investors to make deposits, earning approximately ₹2 crores in undocumented commissions and acquiring properties in his and family members' names. Despite claiming to be merely an employee, evidence from witness statements and forensic audits established his active participation in inducing investments, justifying charges under IPC sections 119, 120, 406, 409, 420 read with MPID Act Section 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: APPEAL/187/2024 Court Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the rejection of his discharge application under Section 227 of the CrPC, finding sufficient prima facie evidence to proceed with charges. Key Reasoning: The court found that appellant Sunil Dada Gaji played a significant role in the Temple Rose Real Estate fraud scheme by luring investors to make deposits, earning approximately ₹2 crores in undocumented commissions and acquiring properties in his and family members' names. Despite claiming to be merely an employee, evidence from witness statements and forensic audits established his active participation in inducing investments, justifying charges under IPC sections 119, 120, 406, 409, 420 read with MPID Act Section 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts