VILE PARLE RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS CHIEF SECRETARY — HCBM10106622026

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010106622026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

CP/6119/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VILE PARLE RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION

    Adv. Rakesh Dubey, ,GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR

  3. 3.MUMBAI SLUM IMPROVEMENT BOARD MUMBAI (A MHADA UNIT)

  4. 4.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WEST

  5. 5.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GR. MUMBAI

  6. 6.SHRI ABHAY TAMTEKE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  7. 7.VIKRAM NIBALKAR DEPUTY ENGINEER

  8. 8.SHRI VILAS BANSODE BRANCH ENGINEER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    On June 8, 2026, the Bombay High Court heard an appeal by Vile Parle Residents Welfare Association against the State of Maharashtra and others. The appellant did not appear, while respondents' counsel submitted that the subject property had already been demolished and no protection could be afforded. The court adjourned the case to June 15, 2026, to be heard "for dismissal." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

On June 8, 2026, the Bombay High Court heard an appeal by Vile Parle Residents Welfare Association against the State of Maharashtra and others. The appellant did not appear, while respondents' counsel submitted that the subject property had already been demolished and no protection could be afforded. The court adjourned the case to June 15, 2026, to be heard "for dismissal." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case