Yogi Apartment Cooperative Housing Society Limited vs Priya Prabhakar Rane — IA/1907/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section Order10Rule1. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Next hearing 13-Mar-2026

CNR: HCBM010106352026

e-Filing Number

19-02-2026

Filing Number

IA/6095/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/1907/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section Order10Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yogi Apartment Cooperative Housing Society Limited

    Adv. DIPTI NAGDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Priya Prabhakar Rane

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra

  3. 3.Vijay Nagar Corporation

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: IA/1907/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay Judge: Milind N. Jadhav, J. Date: June 8, 2026 Citation: 2026:BHC-AS:22928 OUTCOME All four consolidated Writ Petitions DISPOSED with the following orders: 1. WP 5806/2022 – ALLOWED. Orders dated 31.12.2016 (SDO), 30.03.2017 (Collector), and 23.12.2019 (Additional Commissioner) are quashed and set aside. The Tahsildar's order of 28.08.2015 is upheld and confirmed. All mutation entries under that order are restored. 2. WP 17123/2024 – DISMISSED. Order dated 21.10.2024 (Additional Commissioner rejecting the representation) is upheld. 3. WP 16623/2025 – DISMISSED. Revenue Minister's order dated 07.10.2025 setting aside lower orders is upheld and confirmed. 4. WP 16325/2025 – DISMISSED. Revenue Minister's order dated 07.10.2025 is upheld and confirmed. KEY HOLDING The Court found that Ms. Priya Prabhakar Rane failed to establish any fructified ownership rights derived from a 1938 mortgage deed executed between the original owner (Maraji Mhatre) and mortgagee (Yeshwantrao Save). The mortgagee never foreclosed the mortgage or sought property transfer during his lifetime or the 19 years thereafter until his death in 1962. The petitioner's belated claims (after 50+ years) lacked merit, and revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputed title matters. All contentions remain open in the pending declaratory suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1907/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: IA/1907/2026 Court: High Court of Bombay Judge: Milind N. Jadhav, J. Date: June 8, 2026 Citation: 2026:BHC-AS:22928 OUTCOME All four consolidated Writ Petitions DISPOSED with the following orders: 1. WP 5806/2022 – ALLOWED. Orders dated 31.12.2016 (SDO), 30.03.2017 (Collector), and 23.12.2019 (Additional Commissioner) are quashed and set aside. The Tahsildar's order of 28.08.2015 is upheld and confirmed. All mutation entries under that order are restored. 2. WP 17123/2024 – DISMISSED. Order dated 21.10.2024 (Additional Commissioner rejecting the representation) is upheld. 3. WP 16623/2025 – DISMISSED. Revenue Minister's order dated 07.10.2025 setting aside lower orders is upheld and confirmed. 4. WP 16325/2025 – DISMISSED. Revenue Minister's order dated 07.10.2025 is upheld and confirmed. KEY HOLDING The Court found that Ms. Priya Prabhakar Rane failed to establish any fructified ownership rights derived from a 1938 mortgage deed executed between the original owner (Maraji Mhatre) and mortgagee (Yeshwantrao Save). The mortgagee never foreclosed the mortgage or sought property transfer during his lifetime or the 19 years thereafter until his death in 1962. The petitioner's belated claims (after 50+ years) lacked merit, and revenue authorities cannot adjudicate disputed title matters. All contentions remain open in the pending declaratory suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case