ANSARI FAHIM AHMED MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM MAJIDR AHMED MOHAMMAD AMIN AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS — WP/5157/2026

Case under Mah. Pvt. School (C of S) Regulation Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010105422026

Filing Number

WP/6035/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

WP/5157/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Pvt. School (C of S) Regulation Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANSARI FAHIM AHMED MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM MAJIDR AHMED MOHAMMAD AMIN AND ANR

    Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR BAPU DEORE

  2. 2.MASOOD AHMED MAQSOOD AHMED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS

  2. 2.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY)

  3. 3.DY. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION NASHIK

  4. 4.PRESIDENT PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION SOCIETY

  5. 5.HEADMASTER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by establishing a structured timeline for processing the petitioner's pending appointment approval proposal. The court directed the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2) to conduct preliminary scrutiny by May 20, 2026, communicate any deficiencies within 7 days, allow the management 21 days to submit a revised proposal, and pass a reasoned final order within 30 days of receiving the revised proposal. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the proposal's merits, leaving the authority free to decide based on applicable rules and policies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by establishing a structured timeline for processing the petitioner's pending appointment approval proposal. The court directed the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2) to conduct preliminary scrutiny by May 20, 2026, communicate any deficiencies within 7 days, allow the management 21 days to submit a revised proposal, and pass a reasoned final order within 30 days of receiving the revised proposal. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the proposal's merits, leaving the authority free to decide based on applicable rules and policies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case