ANSARI FAHIM AHMED MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM MAJIDR AHMED MOHAMMAD AMIN AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS — WP/5157/2026
Case under Mah. Pvt. School (C of S) Regulation Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010105422026
Filing Number
WP/6035/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
WP/5157/2026
Registration Date
17-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANSARI FAHIM AHMED MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM MAJIDR AHMED MOHAMMAD AMIN AND ANR
Adv. SANJEEV KUMAR BAPU DEORE
MASOOD AHMED MAQSOOD AHMED
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY DEPT AND ORS
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY)
DY. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION NASHIK
PRESIDENT PROGRESSIVE EDUCATION SOCIETY
HEADMASTER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by establishing a structured timeline for processing the petitioner's pending appointment approval proposal. The court directed the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2) to conduct preliminary scrutiny by May 20, 2026, communicate any deficiencies within 7 days, allow the management 21 days to submit a revised proposal, and pass a reasoned final order within 30 days of receiving the revised proposal. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the proposal's merits, leaving the authority free to decide based on applicable rules and policies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by establishing a structured timeline for processing the petitioner's pending appointment approval proposal. The court directed the Education Officer (Respondent No. 2) to conduct preliminary scrutiny by May 20, 2026, communicate any deficiencies within 7 days, allow the management 21 days to submit a revised proposal, and pass a reasoned final order within 30 days of receiving the revised proposal. The court clarified it expressed no opinion on the proposal's merits, leaving the authority free to decide based on applicable rules and policies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts