BHASKAR SADASHIV ZAREKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/5740/2026

Case under Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010105232026

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/6025/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

WP/5740/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Bench Type

Division

Category

ELECTION ( 12 )

Sub-Category

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Muncipalties Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BHASKAR SADASHIV ZAREKAR

Adv. ADV NITIN SHIVRAM SATPUTE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

RETURNING OFFICER (ELECTION OFFICER) STATE ELECTION COMMISSION

COMMISSIONER OF NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

LALITA GHANSHAM MADHAVI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

25-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

The case WP/5740/2026 by petitioner Bhaskar Sadashiv Zarekar against the State of Maharashtra and others could not be heard on 5th May 2026 due to paucity of time. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the matter, directing removal of office objections within two weeks and requiring the petitioner to supply spare copies for service of notice within 14 days, failing which the case would be dismissed against unserved respondents. The case was relisted for further proceedings on a subsequent date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case WP/5740/2026 by petitioner Bhaskar Sadashiv Zarekar against the State of Maharashtra and others could not be heard on 5th May 2026 due to paucity of time. The High Court of Bombay adjourned the matter, directing removal of office objections within two weeks and requiring the petitioner to supply spare copies for service of notice within 14 days, failing which the case would be dismissed against unserved respondents. The case was relisted for further proceedings on a subsequent date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case