PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION vs KISAN TUKARAM MOKATE AND ORS. Advocate - Shirin Shaikh, R.NO. 3 TO 6 — WP/4571/2004
Case under Urban Land Cc & Rd Act 1976. Status: For Orders (Regular). Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010104762002
Filing Number
WP/43522/2002
Filing Date
18-Nov-2002
Registration No
WP/4571/2004
Registration Date
26-May-2004
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Adv. Vishwanath Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISAN TUKARAM MOKATE AND ORS. Advocate - Shirin Shaikh, R.NO. 3 TO 6
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
For Orders (Regular)
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4571/2004 - Pune Municipal Corporation v. Kisan Tukaram Mokate The case was adjourned with the following directions: (1) Petitioner granted one week extension (as a last chance) to amend the petition by deleting Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; (2) Respondent Nos. 3-6's counsel undertook to file a fresh vakalatnama within two weeks, with the petition copy to be served thereafter. No substantive relief was granted on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jan-2021
For Orders
According To Sitting List
-
10-Oct-2019
Other Act Warn List
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari
-
07-Jun-2007
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
07-Jun-2007
Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
21-Apr-2007
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Dr. S. Radhakrishnan
-
25-Nov-2004
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2002
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4571/2004
Case Summary: WP/4571/2004 - Pune Municipal Corporation v. Kisan Tukaram Mokate The case was adjourned with the following directions: (1) Petitioner granted one week extension (as a last chance) to amend the petition by deleting Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; (2) Respondent Nos. 3-6's counsel undertook to file a fresh vakalatnama within two weeks, with the petition copy to be served thereafter. No substantive relief was granted on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts