RITESH DHARAMPAL HANSWANI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — WP/1706/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 14,19,21,226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010104082026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/4437/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
WP/1706/2026
Registration Date
06-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RITESH DHARAMPAL HANSWANI
Adv. Shivani Sunil Kondekar
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
RAJESH NATHURAM JADHAV
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
AT 3.00 P.M.
AT 3.00 P.M.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 17-06-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
Orders
SUMMARY: The Bombay High Court granted interim relief in a Writ Petition under the SC/ST Act, finding a prima facie case in favor of petitioner Ritesh Dharampal Hanswani, who alleged false implication based on evidence showing he was outside India (departed 26.12.2024, exited Italy on 02.01.2025) on the alleged offense date of 01.01.2025. The Court stayed further proceedings in Special Case No. 75 of 2026 before the District Judge, Nashik, until the returnable date of 17.06.2026, and permitted amendment of the petition to challenge the chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Bombay High Court granted interim relief in a Writ Petition under the SC/ST Act, finding a prima facie case in favor of petitioner Ritesh Dharampal Hanswani, who alleged false implication based on evidence showing he was outside India (departed 26.12.2024, exited Italy on 02.01.2025) on the alleged offense date of 01.01.2025. The Court stayed further proceedings in Special Case No. 75 of 2026 before the District Judge, Nashik, until the returnable date of 17.06.2026, and permitted amendment of the petition to challenge the chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts