MR. ASLAM MAQBOOL JUNAIDI AND ANR. vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MAH. STATE BOARD OF WAKF AURANGABAD AND ORS. — IA/2017/2026

Case under The Wakf Act 1995. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 28th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010102512026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

IA/5884/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

IA/2017/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn

Acts & Sections

The Wakf Act 1995

Petitioner(s)

MR. ASLAM MAQBOOL JUNAIDI AND ANR.

Adv. HANIF SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MAH. STATE BOARD OF WAKF AURANGABAD AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

17-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

28-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

23-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

16-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

28-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL

Case Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 12352/2018. The original petition was withdrawn on 25 September 2025 with liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), which was subsequently dismissed on 25 November 2025. The court held that once a petition is withdrawn, it cannot be restored, and declined the restoration application. The petitioners were permitted to pursue other appropriate legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 12352/2018. The original petition was withdrawn on 25 September 2025 with liberty to file a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), which was subsequently dismissed on 25 November 2025. The court held that once a petition is withdrawn, it cannot be restored, and declined the restoration application. The petitioners were permitted to pursue other appropriate legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case