SMT. NAYANANBEN BHOGILAL DOSHI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS(Legal Heir) vs TEJASHRI JAYNTILAL DOSHI DECEASED — IA/2309/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010102472026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

IA/5881/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/2309/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. NAYANANBEN BHOGILAL DOSHI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Abhishek Salian 1.

  2. 2.BHARAT BHOGILAL DOSHI

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN1.

  3. 3.GIRISH BHOGILAL DOOSHI

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN1.

  4. 4.PRARESH BHOGILAL DOSHI

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN

  5. 5.BINA DINESH SHAH DECS THR LRS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN2.

  6. 6.CHAITANYA DINESH SHAH

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN

  7. 7.MADHUKANTA KANTILAL SHAH DECS THR LRS(Legal Heir)

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN3.

  8. 8.KETAN KANTILAL DOSHI

    Adv. ABHISHEK S SALIAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEJASHRI JAYNTILAL DOSHI DECEASED

  2. 2.PRASHANT JAYANTILAL DOSHI

    Adv. Mani

  3. 3.BHAWANA BHARAT SHAH

  4. 4.CHANDANBEN CHANDRAKANT KHIMANI DECS THR LRS(Legal Heir)4.

  5. 5.CHANDRKANT KHIMANI4.

  6. 6.MEHUL CHANDRKANT KHIMANI4.

  7. 7.JAGRUTHI CHANDRAKANT KHIMANI4.

  8. 8.FALGUNI MAYUR SHAH

  9. 9.HARSHA PARESH MODI DECS THR LRS(Legal Heir)5.

  10. 10.PARESH CHANDULAL MODI5.

  11. 11.REEMAN PARESH MODI5.

  12. 12.NEHA PARESH MODI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed the applicants' plea to condone a 99-day delay in filing a Second Appeal, finding their reasons justified given their advanced age and health issues (one applicant suffering from Prostate Cancer, another from Acute CVA and Metabolic Encephalopathy). The court prioritized substantive justice over technicalities, imposing Rs. 10,000 costs on applicants payable to respondents within three weeks, after which the Second Appeal would be registered for admission on June 17, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2309/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the applicants' plea to condone a 99-day delay in filing a Second Appeal, finding their reasons justified given their advanced age and health issues (one applicant suffering from Prostate Cancer, another from Acute CVA and Metabolic Encephalopathy). The court prioritized substantive justice over technicalities, imposing Rs. 10,000 costs on applicants payable to respondents within three weeks, after which the Second Appeal would be registered for admission on June 17, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case