SWAROOP JEETENDRA SAWANT vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/939/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010101952026
Filing Number
BA/4347/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
BA/939/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SWAROOP JEETENDRA SAWANT
Adv. Taraq Sayed
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 24-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Summary: BA/939/2026 - Swaroop Jeetendra Sawant v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court granted bail to Swaroop Jeetendra Sawant in an NDPS case involving recovery of commercial quantities of LSD papers and Ganja, finding prima facie non-compliance with mandatory Section 50 provisions—specifically that the search notice failed to inform the applicant of his right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. The court released the applicant on Rs. 30,000 PR Bond with sureties, noting his clean criminal record and directing trial court to decide the case independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: BA/939/2026 - Swaroop Jeetendra Sawant v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court granted bail to Swaroop Jeetendra Sawant in an NDPS case involving recovery of commercial quantities of LSD papers and Ganja, finding prima facie non-compliance with mandatory Section 50 provisions—specifically that the search notice failed to inform the applicant of his right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. The court released the applicant on Rs. 30,000 PR Bond with sureties, noting his clean criminal record and directing trial court to decide the case independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts