PRITAM RAMCHANDRA NIWATE vs MANISHA PRITAM NIWATE ALIAS MS. MANISHA LAXMAN GAIKAR — IA/2871/2026
Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010101922026
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
IA/5848/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
IA/2871/2026
Registration Date
10-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Coram
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRITAM RAMCHANDRA NIWATE
Adv. aneesh deshpande
Respondent(s)
MANISHA PRITAM NIWATE ALIAS MS. MANISHA LAXMAN GAIKAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-07-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS) |
Orders
Case Summary - IA/2871/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the office objection regarding alleged delay in filing the Family Court Appeal. The court found no delay after excluding 9 days for certified copy processing, calculating that the 90-day period expired on 30th January 2026 despite filing on 23rd January 2026. The Registry was directed to register the appeal, and notice was issued to the respondent returnable on 3rd July 2026, with permission for private mode service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - IA/2871/2026 The Bombay High Court dismissed the office objection regarding alleged delay in filing the Family Court Appeal. The court found no delay after excluding 9 days for certified copy processing, calculating that the 90-day period expired on 30th January 2026 despite filing on 23rd January 2026. The Registry was directed to register the appeal, and notice was issued to the respondent returnable on 3rd July 2026, with permission for private mode service. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts