SUNIL H THARWANI MS THARWANI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD vs NITIN YADAVRAO PAUNIKAR — SA/226/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010101662026

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

SA/5836/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

SA/226/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 58

Petitioner(s)

SUNIL H THARWANI MS THARWANI CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD

Adv. Prasad Ganu Keluskar

Respondent(s)

NITIN YADAVRAO PAUNIKAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

30-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

04-05-2026

FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)

06-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

17-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR

Second Appeal No. 226 of 2026 was adjourned to 17th June 2026. The Bombay High Court admitted the interim application and issued notice to the respondent, finding a substantial question of law regarding whether the Appellate Tribunal could pass an order materially at variance with its earlier order for a co-allottee in the same project. The court granted partial stay on execution of the impugned order modifying the interest payment period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Second Appeal No. 226 of 2026 was adjourned to 17th June 2026. The Bombay High Court admitted the interim application and issued notice to the respondent, finding a substantial question of law regarding whether the Appellate Tribunal could pass an order materially at variance with its earlier order for a co-allottee in the same project. The court granted partial stay on execution of the impugned order modifying the interest payment period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case