M/S. TRIBHUVANDAS BHIMJI ZAVERI M/S. N.N. VAISHNAWA and CO. vs M/S. KIRAN and CO. and ORS. — WP/4029/2004
Case under Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010101382004
Filing Number
WP/12075/2004
Filing Date
26-Mar-2004
Registration No
WP/4029/2004
Registration Date
07-May-2004
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. TRIBHUVANDAS BHIMJI ZAVERI M/S. N.N. VAISHNAWA and CO.
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S. KIRAN and CO. and ORS.
Adv. M/S. SANJAY UDESH AND CO.,R.NO. 2-C 1123
-
2.DWARKADAS JIVANDAS SANGHAVI (DECEASED)(Legal Heir)
Adv. M/S. SANJAY UDESH AND CO. R.NO. 2-C2.
-
3.SMT. VIMLA DWARKADAS SANGHAVI2.
-
4.BALKRISHNA DWARKADAS SANGHAVI2.
-
5.JAYANT DWARKADAS SANGHAVI2.
-
6.ASHOK DWARKADAS SANGHAVI2.
-
7.MEENAKSHI KISHORE MEHTA
-
8.KIRAN DWARKADAS SANGHAVI
-
9.M/S. SANGHAVI TRADING CO.
-
10.M/S. FISHER PEN TRADERS,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying dispute between the parties had already been resolved. The court found no live controversy remaining to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2012
For Orders
Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)
-
27-Feb-2012
For Orders
Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)
-
09-Jan-2012
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF
-
09-Jan-2012
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
30-Aug-2004
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2004
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4029/2004
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the underlying dispute between the parties had already been resolved. The court found no live controversy remaining to adjudicate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts