HARISHCHANDRA DHONDIRAM KALGUDE ELIXIR LEGAL SERVICES vs The State of Maharashtra — CP/191/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 215READWITH2(B). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010099852026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

CP/5723/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

CP/191/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 215READWITH2(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISHCHANDRA DHONDIRAM KALGUDE ELIXIR LEGAL SERVICES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY REVENUE

  3. 3.SHASHIKANT DHONDIRAM KALGUDE

  4. 4.SHIVAJI DHONDIRAM KALGUDE

  5. 5.HIRABAI YASHWANT SHINDE

  6. 6.VINAYAK YASHWANT SHINDE

  7. 7.CHANDRAKANT YASHWANT SHINDE

  8. 8.SURESH YASHWANT SHINDE

  9. 9.LEELA GENU UTEKAR

  10. 10.NANDKUMAR LAXMAN SHINDE

  11. 11.SANJAY LAXMAN SHINDE

  12. 12.SUNIL LAXMAN SHINDE

  13. 13.SHANTA MADHUKAR POTE

  14. 14.PRABHAVATI PRAKASH SHENDAGE

  15. 15.KALPANA ATUL GAIKWAD

  16. 16.SAMIR SHANTARAM PAWAR

  17. 17.SUNIL SHANTARAM PAWAR

  18. 18.SUSHILA GOPINATH GAIKWAD

  19. 19.NIRMALA MAHIPAT MOHITE

  20. 20.SITABAI LAXMAN SHINDE

  21. 21.SACHIN TUKARAM DUDHANE

  22. 22.SUNITA AVINASH GHAG

  23. 23.SAMIKSHA SUNIL SHINDE

  24. 24.SUSHMA RAMCHANDRA RENOSE

  25. 25.KAMAL ANAND MANDARE

  26. 26.SUNANDA RAMESH KADAM

  27. 27.SUNITA RAMESH KADAM

  28. 28.KUNADA JANARDAN MORE

  29. 29.REVATI DIVAN SING

  30. 30.SHUSHMA DESHRAJ SING

  31. 31.USHA SWARAJ SING

  32. 32.PRITESH SWARAJ SING

  33. 33.KETI SWARAJ SING

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the contempt petition while granting an extension to the State Government to decide the pending Revision Application No. 9654 of 2019. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Revisional Authority on 06/04/2026 at 3:00 PM, with the State required to decide the application within three months from that date, while cautioning that if the petitioner fails to appear, appropriate orders may be passed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the contempt petition while granting an extension to the State Government to decide the pending Revision Application No. 9654 of 2019. The court directed the petitioner to appear before the Revisional Authority on 06/04/2026 at 3:00 PM, with the State required to decide the application within three months from that date, while cautioning that if the petitioner fails to appear, appropriate orders may be passed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case